Scatter is a well known word in the radio propagation
"theatre". Most of use have experienced some form of
scatter path in real life. Operators enjoying the use of large
antenna systems deal with it on a daily basis, almost every time
they are operating. Hardly ever is it possible to hear ones own
scattered signal, as turn around propagation time in terrestrial
communications is fairly short. However, when sometimes using
break-in keying one can hear the echoes of self-transmitted
signals coming back from distant reflections or scatter. On the
HF bands this is most prevalent when operating at times when your
station is in the grey-line zone and signals may circle the earth
a number of times with surprisingly low attenuation. Delays may
grow to a substantial fraction of one second, which is after all
a considerable delay, when exercising fast CW-transmission.
During the numerous F2 openings of the last couple of years on
50 MHz we have often observed the hollow sounding back-scattered
signals of other stations in our region. This effect is similar
to the things we hear when listening with high gain antennas on
the lower frequency bands when the propagation is open and
signals are covering large geographical areas. This time we will
briefly touch a scatter effect that is present even when normal
skip conditions do not exist: D-layer ionoscatter, an always
existing phenomenon.
Very little has been written about this scatter effect
probably due to the fact that the ionoscatter mode is not
accessible to low ERP stations. However, with ever expanding
sizes of stacked arrays and a more liberal licensing policy in
some countries leading to higher legal power outputs, the D-layer
scatter propagation is showing up more frequently. Soon it will
be possible to enjoy it regularly at least in reception mode if
mid-size antennas are employed. For reference a good friend of
mine: Don, W0PO, used this mode in his 50 MHz pioneering days. He
lived in Colorado, just outside Boulder. With a 8877 amplifier
and a 6-element Yagi he could work the Californian stations of
similar calibre, any time when beaming from the Colorado plains
over the Rocky mountains. The following information supposedly
adds to the confusion about the numerous propagation modes in
this interesting VHF-spectrum range, but also to a better
understanding of the many faces of the 50 MHz band.
Lately many questions have been thrown up regarding gaps in
explanations of certain phenomena. Depending on the reader this
may rise more questions or fill in some minor gaps in the
"labyrinths" of the lower ionosphere. The D-layer is
situated at approximately 60 Km height, and for proper scatter
coupling the antennas of the stations involved have to see a
substantial "common volume" of the D-layer to be able
to communicate. In this respect the process is very similar to
troposcatter at higher VHF frequencies. In troposcatter the
signal is scattered by natural irregularities of the refraction
index in the lower atmosphere, i.e.: variations of humidity
(clouds), whereas with ionoscatter it is due to irregularities in
the electron content of the D-layer. Simply due to the height
difference of the "responsible" layer, troposcatter is
useful up to distances of 700 Km, whereas D-layer is at best in
the 600/ 1300 Km range.
The general rule for a high power station is that he will
cover any 1300 Km path with first line of sight, ground wave,
troposcatter, and finally ionoscatter propagation. This parade
will mostly be topped by sparking "displays" of meteor
bursts, some of them with spectacular Doppler.
Anyone having monitored the vast number of 50Kw and stronger
TV-station carriers around 48.25 and 49.75 MHz will know what I
mean. A very similar effect occurs when the E-layer is in a state
of ionization so that the MUF is a few megahertz short of full
reflection for the distance in question. At that moment E-layer
scatter occurs, and again due to its natural height of 90-110 Km
the "easiest" communication range of 1800 to 2200 Km is
observed.
For multi hop circuits all points except one have to support
virtually full reflection as power transferred forward through a
scattering region will not be sufficient to "feed" a
second scattering region. Therefore we can assume that multi hop
E-layer propagation can take place. However, at short wave
frequencies the D-layer will never reflect signals as such.
Hence, it is safe to assume D-layer communications strictly as a
single circuit case, unless very fancy geomagnetic conditions are
prevailing. There is very much to be said about the
characteristics of ionoscatter. and one need not be surprised
that there is a diurnal variation of scatter level as well as
wave polarization dependence. Irrespective of the variations, it
is for sure that D-layer scatter is always there, and this is the
reason why the 40-80 MHz range has been so popular among certain
organizations wanting to be absolutely sure that some form of
channel for distance communication is always available, no matter
what natural or human-induced conditions are prevalent. This also
partially explains, why it has been very difficult in some
countries to negotiate the availability of the 50 MHz band for
experimental use in the form as we experience it these days. In
many countries the licenses do not impose an ERP limit. Thus
ionoscatter experiments encourage the construction of large
antenna arrays. Apart from the fact that the bigger antenna
systems make all the difference in the world in accessing
previously undiscovered (combinations of) scattering modes and
related impressive results in long-haul DXing, the concentration
of energy in a narrow azimuthal sector also effectively reduces
interference in many other directions. Finally we can look at the
map of Europe and estimate the useful potential of ionoscatter
communications. Given the licencing policy of Denmark with the
considerable power level allowed, we find OZ stations in a fairly
central position. With the 1300 Km ionoscatter range they can
cover most of Europe with this mode. Stations running 400 Watts
and a stack of two Yagis spaced 0.6 wavelengths, can be copied
almost 24 hours a day with similar arrays for signal reception.
With smaller antennas signals can be copied during the better
peaks of ionoscatter on a diurnal basis. The intention of this
article is not to go into extreme detail, but to leave the
secrets of ionoscatter for experimental work and discovery in
real life. Other interesting paths are the OH-PA/DL, 1-PA/G,
CT-G/EI paths and all other combinations in the 600-1300 Km
range.
To facilitate the experiments we propose a 50.270-50.290 MHz
ionoscatter range in all future band plans. Due to the
proliferation of computers, modems and other digital equipment
generating interfering carriers at unpredictable frequencies in
the VHF range, we do not like the idea of a single calling
frequency. A multi frequency calling sequence is proposed,
starting at the 50.280 MHz central activity frequency, followed
by calls on 50.282,50.284 MHz until the call is answered. Spare
frequencies of 50.276, and 50.278 MHz may be used and of course
any other prearranged frequency in the 50.270-50.290 MHz range
during schedules is acceptable. The special experimenting range
is proposed to facilitate acquaintance of the mode, and to avoid
local interference to DX-traffic around 50.110 MHz and to the
poor dynamic range of other receivers during experiments of long
duration.
In practice, however, a ionoscatter QSO can be conducted
anywhere in the non-DX part of the band, and it is in no way
different from a regular QSO supported by any other propagation
mode. Highly directional antennas will effectively reduce average
overall interference.
Wishing you all the personal discovery of a new and exciting
propagation feature.
73 Jan OH1ZAA / 0H2MZA.
UKSMG Six News issue
30,
June 1991 |
|